Oh, alright, the title of this article is disgusting. Gay niggers for Jesus. What the hell is this all about!

Has anybody ever asked what if? What if black people have latched onto their commiserating friends and convenient victims, the gay people? Has anybody ever explored this question? How come Barney Frank is elevated to near guru status by the Democratic Party as though somehow being on the Banking Committee is commensurate with his background as a Harvard lawyer. I smell a hefty dose of bullshit around Mr. Frank, because typically lawyers know little if anything about finance other than how much money they can make for themselves. What the hell qualifies Barney Frank to be chairman of the House Banking Committee? Perhaps because he is Jewish? Excuse me, but this obviously won’t fly because that would be a stereotype that the Democrats typically don’t like to stick onto people.

No, the whole phenomenon of black liberation is predicated upon the linkage to other supposed downtrodden classes of people, most notably are the homosexuals. Oh, the poor homosexuals. They have it so bad. Black people rush to link up with them because it perpetuates and lends credence to their own sense of victimization. And by golly, the gay community rushes in and accepts the mantle of victimization because it will get them their fifteen minutes of fame. Forget about whether this fucks up the entire banking system, bails out millionaires on Wall Street, and saddles the taxpayers with mountains of debt. It’s all about the great pity party alliance of blacks and gays, alas running the country the way they envision it - a chicken in every bed and a Kleenex box near every wing back chair.

The whole gay experience leaves me perfectly cold. I understand it completely, which befuddles me, because my gay friends know that they will not receive special treatment from me. In a peculiar way, this attracts them to me more than their overtly gay friends, which of course leads to a deep resentment by the gay community. How is it that this straight acting man can woo queens over to his “side” and still not become a raging maniacal freak? Oh, but it is not only possible but is quite wonderful and extraordinary.

I treat everyone equally, which ironically is what the new national victim movement is trying to accomplish. To these radicals everyone has to be somehow coerced into believing what most people already accept. The phenomenon of what is called “Starbucks Republicans” is nothing less than a statement which lends itself to the equalization of information on all political levels, i.e., the Freedom of Information Act with a double shot of espresso. There are no more secrets in the Information Age, but there is still a thing called self-respect, and as a result of which there is respect of others.

Perhaps I am the problem with why there is the rise of the Obama phenomenon. I exude acceptance as though it were normal and pan-national. I make it look easy, which it is not. We at The Daily Nigger actually assume that people are open-minded, which of course assumes that people have a reasonably developed mind in the first place. We take nothing for granted, yet we assume many things. Perhaps it is our fault that we assumed that people could see beyond race and understand the dilemma facing America in the scurrilous age of mass media-imposed political correctness.

We strive to be ourselves because that is what is demanded of a good writer. In order to be appealing to the public, The Daily Nigger must speak from the heart and express thoughts that are the innermost and heartfelt sentiments that one holds dear. We know that the way to a reader’s heart is through intimacy and honesty. We are the greatest hooker in the world, the Deep Throat of post-modern intellectualism, and the Long Dong Silver of western ideologies. We hold back nothing and speak from our inner fiber. Our emotions run deep, yet our remarks are as relevant as the feeling one gets from having stepped into a mud puddle on what was otherwise a casual stroll. We want to excite our readers with the truth by letting you step into the darkness where we also peruse.

How appropriate it is to write such remarks on Halloween, the quintessential national holiday of reincarnation. It is possible to die and be born again in the same life. Perhaps this is the message of Jesus after all, and it is also appropriate for those who feel they must go down the path of mutual self-pity. Because there is not merit in worthlessness no more than there is no sensibility in self-aggrandizement. The entire human self-absorption routine is fruitless and pointless, and in the end we are all people who are judged based upon our actions.

It’s awful to be called a nigger, and it’s equally as bad to be singled out as being gay. Not everyone who is black thinks about the color of their skin, and not everyone who is gay thinks about their sexual orientation either. The whole equality movement is a forgone conclusion, because once the discussion of it starts it is already over. The mere act of bringing up the topic of inequality is an act of equalization. It is almost laughable if the exchange of ideas on the topic lasts more than one sentence. In short, it becomes ridiculous to discuss such matters which otherwise are not even worth a discussion in the first place.

They can take affirmative action and ditch it for all I’m concerned. And they can take the gay marriage agenda and ditch that, too. I haven’t met a heterosexual yet who isn’t either happy enough in their marriage that they don’t talk about it at all, or they are so stridently committed to being alone that a team of horses couldn’t drag them to the altar. And for those who want divorce there is that, too. But of course that is a legal matter, which is not an emotional issue at all and divorce isn’t or shouldn’t be taken to heart otherwise it is advisable to either check oneself into their local police department or make up with their ex spouse.

To be treated like or called a nigger is a referendum on ones overt feeling of self-pity and as a result entitlement to things which are not theirs to begin with. To constantly draw attention to ones sexual orientation is the equivalent of being called a nigger, however, it is calculated and intentional rather than the reverse. For some odd reason blacks have joined with gays and vice versa to ride the great wave of pity that has somehow convinced Americans that the conversation we all must have regarding race and sexuality is not only necessary but is righteous.

Perhaps this is why I refuse to back either of the mainstream media’s anointed candidates. I do not want my viewpoint hijacked and packaged into a trite advertising campaign. I do not want to join with the multitudes of others whose ideas have been formed as a result of network news reports. I don’t want my relationships to be guided by ideologies that are not my own. In short, I do not want to be treated like a nigger. I will not allow my innermost feelings to become a tool of media exploitation so that I can somehow gloat at the presence of my opinions being expressed by highly paid, well-groomed talk show hosts. I don’t want my views to be mainstream, but rather I want them to be mine just as I would want yours to be yours as well.

The revulsion with which people have viewed third party candidates is a perfect reflection of how hard the two main parties want to woo these so-called independent voters to their side. It is as though the two parties are desperately trying to portray themselves as the torch bearer of things to come, when actually they are no more than that which has already passed. I do not care to align myself with any political movement simply because they are for or against an issue involving race or sexual orientation. To me, the whole idea is senseless, and to prove the point I chose to vote for Ron Paul on a write-in ballot. I haven’t heard him say a word about race or sex, and frankly this is the way it ought to be. But of course, people have to play the victim card on either side in order to dramatize the issue to the point of ridiculousness. To that I ask, what would Jesus do? And on that note I feel damn proud for the way I have behaved during this election.

-TDN

What a whorehouse this whole election has become. It came complete with a preacher cursing and swearing and Obama girls shaking their booties. Then there was the closeted gay preacher, Father Pfleger, whose calling may have been missed by not, ahem, appearing on To Catch A Predator on NBC. Toss in some great staging and a web site ATM, and what you have is a giant political orgasm of American self-absorption.

The whole pathetic nonsense is just nothing but a whorehouse, and the madam is definitely the media. They are screwing their patrons and making them like it. I really have to hand it to the mainstream media, because I wish I could be as patently ridiculous as they are. But of course, in blogadelphia, blogylvania the only person who really matters isn’t Joe the Plumber but rather Tom the Blogger.

We sit here day after miserable day hoping for people to pay attention to us and what we have to say. We bloggers are on a mission from God, and we are going to be heard no matter how insanely tied up in the whole matter we become. We are biased in favor of not being biased. We are crude, obnoxious, prying little jerk-offs who annoy people and make them hate our guts and love us at the same fucked up moment. We are in fact crazy as shit, and we have a good reason to be.

The mainstream media bought this election years ago. They groomed this Obama character up from when he first arrived in Chicago. The Chicago revolutionary army apparently is operating within the city limits of the city, and for some bizarre unexplainable reason Che Guevara and Malcolm X got channeled by Louis Farrakhan. Oh, old Louis Farrakhan, the great grandpappy of hate. The one who got away. The man who dared the system and won. The Larry Flynt of religion. Louis Farrakhan is the embodiment of revolution in America. He is the one to fear, the secret power, and the sixth sense all rolled into one jumbo tampon of a human being. Better watch out, especially on Halloween just before this election. If anybody comes dressed as either Obama or Farrakhan, you better not open the door or else you might feel a slight prick.

We are gingerly being led the way down into the world of sin by a gaggle of people whose sole greatness lies within the deep recesses of their short term memory, capable only of storing rousing 15 minute speeches laced with sweet little nothings. Hope! Change! Yes we can! Blah, blah, blah until I’m about to toss my cookies and in need of a serious mouth washing. Sometimes saying stupid sweet words is more sinful than saying well-placed ugly words. The inference being that one is too stupid to even begin to understand what is being said to them in the first place.

But of course this is the world of do-re-mi politics, and repeat after me is the Twenty-first century version of drop out and tune in. It’s all the same shit, really, and what makes this so sad to watch is that a majority of people actually now believe that slogans are important. It is as though when I see the armada of vehicles on the road with Obama stickers in all different shapes and sizes that I’m supposed to be stricken with guilt that I am not part of the new simpleton class that has sprung up in America. It is as though a dumb generation has grown up to not only accept their stupidity, but to celebrate it.

The media has its tentacles into the majority of people in America, and they have them by the balls. People proved that they could be lied to about weapons of mass destruction, and after that deal was done by the media the rest was a piece of cake. The verdict was rendered: Most people in America are flat out stupid and need to be lied to because they are so completely unaware of what is going on right under their noses.

This phenomenon has been documented before. I remember reading Neil Postman’s Amusing Ourselves to Death back in the 1980’s when it first came out. I remember worshiping this book back then like many people worship The Audacity of Hope today. The only difference is that the book anticipated the advent of the media whorehouse that we have today. Postman literally predicted the coming of what we have today - an infomercial President. The media has degraded the office of President by first trying and yet failing to destroy George W. Bush and then figuring out that you can attract more flies with honey. And that they have clearly done.

The media has their guy now despite the fact that he is a complete buffoon who can’t even exercise good judgment by staying away from hateful degenerates and criminals. But of course he gives good speeches and this is vital to a good candidate. He also satisfies the racial “cool” factor without being either one race of the other. He is not only teflon, but he is also fire-retardant having been sprayed with a coating of “I dare you”.

But some of us do dare him, and we are overlooked because that’s not in the mainstream. That it isn’t cool. We are disrupting America’s delirious daydream of waking up one day and being Prince Charming after having also proven that without any lines to read from Prince Charming really doesn’t exist. What a let down that must be to people who watch as the world passes them by. The Internet requires good communication skills, but you also have to make sense and have a trade. Throwing up a web site doesn’t make anybody a genius, but you wouldn’t know that from meeting most Americans, including Obama.

Oh yeah, he cashed out on his web site. He raked in around $100 million from the whole shabang. He actually made enough to pay millions to have a 30-minute commercial produced about him - yes, him. He is the great orator, who really has nothing to say except for some tag lines he learned that came from his own web site. How utterly boring and what a ridiculous waste of time all this would be, except for the point of making an historical statement for the record. The issue we are facing now is how to deal with the fact that America is now firmly rooted into the mainstream media and vice versa. The circle is complete and the giant beast moves along albeit at a snail’s pace.

The media’s massive power and force is only useful when its self-interest does not retard its movement. The very notion of controlling others lends itself to a bad case of a swollen ego. This beast has latched onto the victims that they themselves have created. The Color Purple comes to life in the fields of Chicago. Suddenly we can all sing hallelujah - free at last, free at last, thank God almighty we’re free at last. A giant blast from the great horns will be heard around the mountaintops as the great media whore revels in all the great gold and trinkets that the people have bestowed upon it. Little eunuchs will fan the great media executives and the virgins will feed them grapes. And the people will puke their guts up at the very notion of a ruling elite class of anyone running their lives and making a mockery out of the American style of freedom that we know still lives on in the tiny corners of this country where reality is still a virtue.

-TDN

For those of you who are not familiar with what the Fairness Doctrine is, allow me to let you know. It’s very simple. The Fairness Doctrine was a policy of the Federal Communications Commission that required those who held broadcast licenses to present “controversial issues of pubic importance and to do so in a manner that honest, equitable and balanced.”

Whew, man, let me tell you something. (While wringing my hands and shaking my head …) If that crap comes back then we’re all screwed, and basically I wouldn’t put it past Obama to put something like this into place. After all, his supporters, mentors, preachers, fathers, etc., - - practically every single person of importance to this man are people who have been indoctrinated by the Fairness Doctrine.

The Fairness Doctrine was basically stricken from the rule book by President Reagan after Jimmy Carter’s great national malaise had finally been lifted. The rule sat on the books since 1949 until finally the mainstream media matured to the point in which it did in the 1970’s and suddenly the nation watched in horror as people began being treated like vacant fools. This era was an incredibly dark time for America and not simply because of the way in which Mr. Carter’s entire presidency was poorly handled. The movie Network highlighted this era with an alarming look at the sheer control which the media has over people.

Honestly the pall that was cast on America during Jimmy Carter was the absolute horror in which people watched the mainstream media captivate their lives and hold them hostage. Carter wouldn’t play to the media, and so the media took control of the country. Parents watched in awe as their children began being raised by television. Long before the advent of child care there was television care. The media executives of today were raised during those times, and if any one group of people know how to influence and otherwise propagandize people then it is baby boomers. People had had enough of the results of media indoctrination, yet by the time Reagan was elected in 1980 who rolled back the Fairness Doctrine, the damage had already been done. A President must submit to the media or be crucified by them.

There is only one thing that I would say to Mr. Obama if I ever had the chance to meet him in person. I would first casually remind him that the most important people in his life so far have been people who were raised by the media. Then I would tell Obama that he embodies all the political correctness of the media generation’s first official high-ranking offering, and frankly it is nothing short of laughable. I would say to him, Mr. Obama quite simply you are a joke and a fool for having been wrapped up for sale.

The list goes on about how his wealth and power have come from sources which have heretofore been unknown. Everyone seems to want to know where this guy came from. Even the Head Nigger in Charge ["HNIC"] here at the Daily Nigger has been scratching his head wondering why it is that nobody seems to know much about this guy. I respect the Head Nigger in Charge’s opinion very much, and I believe him when he says that Obama was literally groomed by the media since he was a child. Everyone seems to want to know how the connection was established between Bill Ayers and Barack Obama if there was such a huge age difference. The bottom line is that Bill Ayers was likely an arrangement made for Mr. Obama in a long list of other arranged liasons made courtesy of the mainstream media and their surrogates. Obama quite simply will be America’s first President which was built from the ground up by the media, that is, if the media has its way.

And so, let’s be honest that Obama is not running for President of the United States. Instead the media is conducting a referendum on America and Obama is their salesperson of choice. The Head Nigger In Charge and I were having a little chat yesterday evening about The Daily Nigger and Obama and what it all means. As with most conversations I have with the HNIC, we talk about politics and the day’s events. Most notably however yesterday given Obama’s 30-minute infomercial, the HNIC said to me that the media won’t run the L.A. Times video of Rashid Khalidi because this would only serve to prove what the media already knows.

Now, hold on a second, I told the HNIC. You mean to tell me that the media won’t tell the truth because they are simply playing politics? Yep, the HNIC replied to me. The media is electing their guy to office, and what I fear the most is that Obama will bring back The Fairness Doctrine.

At that moment it began to sink in as to exactly how right on and true and honest and decent The Daily Nigger really is. And how righteous and learned and wise and decent the HNIC is. The truth is hard to believe sometimes, but now is not the time to ignore it. The truth is that the media is running the United States of America, and they learned how to do it from people who were indoctrinated by the Fairness Doctrine during their most formative early childhood years.

Even the people who print the money, The Federal Reserve, have learned how to play the media game. Instead of giving billions of dollars to the investment bankers on Wall Street directly, they offer the dollars to offshore central banks. Let’s see, the economy is in the shitter, Congress won’t act soon enough to give money back to Wall Street that they lost from essentially gambling, and so the way the Federal Reserve gets around the whole mess is by funneling the money through offshore banks. Their “constituency”, aka Wall Street, still gets the money because the foreign banks will invest the money right back with who …? Wall Street, of course. Yet, this maneuver only got a small blurb of a mention by the mainstream media, because of course the media sanctions this kind of debauchery.

Only in America could Exxon-Mobil make its largest profit ever, while at the same time people are flat broke. And all the while the media only pays a very small bit of attention to the whole matter which has been going on for some years now. The oil companies are the media’s pet, and the elected officials of this country are powerless. If the oil companies need to make more money, then they smartly turn to their media “consultants” and whip up more hysteria than you can shake a stick at: Global warming, peak oil, middle eastern strife, islamic terrorism, and on and on and on.

The way the war on terror will eventually be won is if people wake up to the fact that their lives are being run by some people sitting behind a computer screen in a control room. This shouldn’t really come as a shock to anyone anyway, because after all the latest Obama trick was for the media to portray him in an Oval Office setting even before the media has a chance to officially appoint him as their flavor of the year. The media has had enough of George Bush because they couldn’t control him. Bush pissed them off because he did what he wanted to do, not what the media wanted him to do. One only imagines how furious the politically correct crowd at the mainstream media must be at the fact that they had to work so hard in hot, dusty countries where there was no Evian and gyms available and where women are treated like second class citizens.

How unfortunate it must have been to the media to have had to work so hard for the things that they portray on the screen. It’s one thing to espouse great principles, it’s another thing altogether to have to work for those principles. The Fairness Doctrine, however, conveyed the highly inappropriate and easily manipulated message that someone else knows what’s best for you other than you. This is the entire premise upon which this election has been cast, and the more the media piles onto Obama the hotter he seems to get. The mainstream media runs this country, by God, and not matter what us pissant little bloggers have to say about it won’t really matter one iota.

Quite simply put, we don’t regurgitate lines someone lectured us about at The Daily Nigger. We don’t stand around with our thumb up our ass in fear that Obama is going to frown upon The Daily Nigger and shut us down. We actually want him to try doing that, because then people will see just how dangerous it is to go up against the mighty media political correctness machine. Hopefully though before things like that happen people will wake up and see what it means to have their government literally run by the media and be subjected to politically correct manners of behavior and speech which have nothing to do with the actual will of the people.

-TDN

What is the real meaning behind the black hatred of Jews? Let’s be honest for a change and realize that the real reason for and honest connection between black liberation theology and the American black community’s support of all-things Islamic is not a unifying belief but rather is a hatred of Jews. Nobody wants to touch upon this issue, but The Daily Nigger has decided to go there.

Yes, it’s abundantly clear that American blacks are rallying around Barack Obama because he represents the perfect combination of white and black and Islamic and Christian so that he can sneak through the litmus test for what has up to now been a firm commitment to America’s unique relationship with Israel. Indulge me, please for a moment and allow me to explain.

The so-called ‘balance of power’ is unmistakable in the sense that whomever has their finger on the proverbial button in the White House has the power to determine who gets a pass on the possession and ultimate use of nuclear weapons. So far, this has been limited by and large to Western nations with certain exceptions. However, with Obama in the White House one can be reasonably certain to assume that nuclear capabilities will be expanded to other countries, which by the way are on the record as having a complete and utter disdain for the State of Israel.

It is time to call this election what it is, which is a referendum on America’s relationship with Israel. This relationship is being trashed and America will find itself being relegated to the status of a rogue nation much like others who have declared their intent on destroying Israel. We can talk all day long about Obama’s “questionable relationships”, but the buzzword behind such language is that the question is already being answered: America is succumbing to black hatred of Jews.

There is absolutely no alternative approach toward understanding the dynamics of this election and the consistency with which the reasoning has evolved toward labeling Obama as “racial” other than to consider the fact the quantum shift that is occurring in American politics is decidedly anti-Israel and even anti-Jewish. It is foolish to consider using the term “anti-Semitic”, because Arabs are Semites themselves, and therefore the focus of this election in 2008 is clearly anti-Jewish.

It is a fact that Barack Obama was literally nurtured from a young man in the Islamic religion, yet no one bats an eye because of course he had no choice as a young man where his influences were derived from. Later in life, however, it is a fact that Obama’s higher education was promoted if not funded by individuals whose beliefs were not simply Islamic but were virulently anti-Israel. This is not speculation, but rather it is a fact, and for some reason Americans couldn’t care less that their long-standing alliance with Israel is being plowed under.

Yes, it’s absolutely true that American blacks hate Jews, and they have Obama as their number one star. But they have miscalculated on one important issue, which is that were it not for Albert Einstein, Robert Oppenheimer, Hyman Rickover, and Edward Teller America probably would not have achieved the military victories that it has in modern history.

And so, for all the hatred and contempt and double-speak intended to confuse and woo Jews there is a clear and present danger that cannot be ignored. From Jeremiah Wright to Louis Farrakhan, the message is the same: American blacks hate Jews, and they are carrying this message all the way to the White House so that ultimately they can screw themselves with it by making a complete and utter fool of themselves and as a result the entire United States of America.

So, my advice is to go ahead and hate all you guys want. It’s only going to come back on yourselves and all the glorious victories of recent history will fade into the past as though it were not even a blip on the radar screen. Perhaps metaphorically it can be stated eloquently from the Bible that those who bless Israel shall be bless and those who curse Israel shall be cursed. The fact remains that America used to be a friend of Israel, but that is changing. For those of us whose ears are tuned in closely and who are reading the tea leaves carefully, Obama’s message is very clearly interpreted as nothing less than contempt for and hatred of Jews that is all too well familiar.

-TDN

By Daniel Pipes
The Jerusalem Post
October 27, 2008

One watches with dismay as Democratic candidate Barack Obama manages to hide the truth on his longstanding, if indirect ties to two institutions: the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), listed by the US government in 2007 as an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas-funding trial; and the Nation of Islam (NoI), condemned by the Anti-Defamation League for its “consistent record of racism and anti-Semitism.”

First, Obama’s ties to Islamists:

• The Khalid al-Mansour connection: According to former Manhattan Borough president Percy Sutton, Mansour “was raising money for” Obama’s expenses at Harvard Law School. Mansour, a black American (né Don Warden), became adviser to Saudi prince Al-Walid bin Talal, CAIR’s largest individual donor. Mansour holds standard Islamist views: He absolves the Islamist government in Sudan of sponsoring slavery, he denies a Jewish tie to Jerusalem and he wrote a booklet titled “Americans Beware! The Zionist Plot Against S. Arabia.” (Both Obama and Mansour deny Sutton’s account.)

• The Kenny Gamble (also known as Luqman Abdul-Haqq) connection: Gamble, a once-prominent pop music producer, cut the ribbon to the Obama campaign headquarters housed in a South Philadelphia building he owns. Gamble is an Islamist who buys large swaths of real estate in Philadelphia to create a Muslim-only residential area. Also, as the self-styled “amir” of the United Muslim Movement, he has many links to Islamist organizations, including CAIR and the Muslim Alliance in North America. (MANA’s “amir” is Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.)

• The Mazen Asbahi connection: The Obama campaign’s first Muslim outreach coordinator resigned after it came to light that he had served on the board of a subsidiary of the Saudi-sponsored North American Islamic Trust, with Jamal Said, another unindicted co-conspirator in the 2007 Hamas funding trial. Asbahi has ties to CAIR’s Chicago and Detroit offices, to the Islamic Society of North America, yet another unindicted co-conspirator in the Hamas funding trial, and to other Islamist organizations.

• The Minha Husaini connection: The campaign’s second Muslim outreach coordinator has an Islamist background, having served as an intern in the Muslim Public Service Network. Immediately upon her appointment by Obama, she met with a group of about 30 Muslims including such notorious figures as CAIR’s Nihad Awad; the Muslim American Society’s Mahdi Bray, who has publicly supported Hamas and Hizbullah; and Johari Abdul Malik of the Dar al-Hijrah Mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, who has advised American Muslims: “You can blow up bridges, but you cannot kill people who are innocent on their way to work.”

SECOND, OBAMA’s ties to the Nation of Islam:

Obama’s long-time donor and ally Antoin “Tony” Rezko partnered for nearly three decades with Jabir Herbert Muhammad, a son of NoI leader Elijah Muhammad, and says he gave Jabir and his family “millions of dollars over the years.” Rezko also served as executive director of the Muhammad Ali Foundation, a rogue organization that, without Ali’s permission, exploited the name of this CAIR awardee.

Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s esteemed pastor for 20 years, came out of a Nation background. Recently he accepted protection from an NoI security detail, and has praised Louis Farrakhan, the NoI’s leader, as one of the “giants of the African American religious experience.” Wright’s church celebrated Farrakhan for his having “truly epitomized greatness.”

Farrakhan himself endorsed Obama, calling him “the hope of the entire world,” “one who can lift America from her fall,” and even “the messiah.”

That Obama’s biography touches so frequently on such unsavory organizations as CAIR and the Nation of Islam should give pause. How many of politicians have a single tie to either group, much less seven of them?