After a lot of hand wringing and gnashing of teeth, it is time to tell the truth about the term ‘diversity’. This one is not going to be easy, especially if you have not paid close attention to The Daily Nigger’s previous propaganda lessons.

First of all as you all are acutely aware, we hand out this award each week to someone or something as the case may be, which is undoubtedly linked to propaganda in the media, education, and elsewhere. Some of you may have mistaken what we are trying to put forth as some kind of condemnation of others based upon the color of their skin, their sexual proclivities, or whatever country they may come from whether recently or in the distant past. Nope. That’s not what this is about. Rather, this award is intended to point out how those disparate groups of people are offered up at the altar of ‘the greater good’ in return for a few crumbs of fizzing popularity, which can be best described perhaps as being a doormat for those who know how to use others as a tool to gain power.

We know this is a difficult subject, and to be perfectly honest it is sometimes hard even for the best propagandists to stay on message. However, we do want to hand it to the Democrats and to Obama in particular, who is deftly suited for the job of weaving the all-too-familiar, yet elusive concept of ‘diversity’ into his clever pitch, which by most accounts can be clearly seen as nothing more than a smokescreen for gaining power.

Diversity is a buzzword, which to be perfectly honest is the anti-nigger word, that is, it is the acceptable way of uttering racial slurs or referring to those whose sexual preference is not the majority. It is a loaded word, which in many cases debases the concept of the individual at the individual’s choosing in return for something which is a payback, usually not represented tangibly. Others gain power by utilizing this word. You could almost see it and touch it when Obama gave his recent speech which we presented for you below, whereby he launches into his Negro speech patterns. The subtlety is akin to a jackhammer going off in your bedroom at 3 a.m. A manner of speech can have the power of the almighty and feared F-bomb, when it is unleashed cleverly. It underscores the victim mentality without referring to it by name. It summons the ingrained imagery of the me-against-the-world mindset that is pervasive in the blame game world, which has given rise to the uniquely modern American pop cultural lexicon predicated upon ’social justice’.

In real terms it works like this: Let’s say that you fit into one of the stereotypical permanent victim groups. And of course, the pattern which has been preset for these groups is as follows: Trade off your individuality, including your personal goals and aims in life, in return for participation in a publicity and PR game in which group identification has been molded and shaped for you. You will be given intangible gifts such as a feeling of participation in return for granting tangible power over your life by others. Let’s break down a few by category:

1. Illegal immigrant: Give up your desire to be a legal part of America in return for not being threatened to be kicked out, which simply continues the recognition of illegal immigrants as an undefined class of individuals.
2. Gay: Give up your desire to be a fully assimilated and thus indistinguishable part of the straight world in return for continuing to being recognized as gay and separate and thus further singled out and marginalized.
3. Black: Give up your desire to be known as having independently achieved equality with your white counterparts in return for government enforced special designations in the workplace, housing, and in the courts, which further exacerbates the concept of racism.

The key to all three of these groups is that their “issues” never become resolved. This is the point of keeping them in the forefront of the discussion, because it will never be resolved. That’s the point. This is the purpose of using these groups because sexual repression cannot be resolved regardless of how much sex or what kind of sex one has. The issue of the color of ones skin can never be resolved because this is the accident of birth that simply occurred. Sounds like a simple truth, right? Not so. Consider those who are here to work yet who will not be given an identification because simply put, nobody wants to have to admit it. And thus all of these arguments never get resolved. These are the building blocks of self-deception, which good propagandists know how to package and deliver to those who seek power over these and other groups of people.

And so the question is, why would groups like these which are so much in the forefront of the discussion of American popular culture today, choose to be corralled into these restrictive definitions? In other words, what’s in it for them to continue the stereotypes? That’s easy. Illegal immigrants are illegal because by and large they are here to work and make money. They come from countries where governments are knowingly corrupt. They see America as no different than their country. And so to them, there is no point of trying to change things when the object is to make money. The corruption in America is clearly seen by these people who are here to escape it in their own countries. This also serves American business interests well because without a pool of relatively cheap, reliable labor profits would take a huge hit. The politicians love it too because they get paid from lobbyists, which represent business interests that thrive from this. This is the simple truth. Not very hard to figure out. But of course when you exploit the situation and sensationalize it, then it can be packaged and sold like an underground derivatives market that bets on the price of illegal labor.

Gays on the other hand are the perennial hot potato. They are absolutely 100% necessary for any effective propaganda campaign, and the way it is done is by tossing them from the left to the right, from liberal to conservative, Democrat to Republican. Nobody wants to really hold onto this issue for too long because you might get burned by it. The name of the game is to acknowledge it in passing without staying too long on the subject because one might become perceived as gay themselves. Therefore, homosexuality cuts straight to the core of how political propaganda works because by default gays become an essential element in promoting the notion of sexual repression. It is on the one hand unspeakable and thus dismissed out of hand as worthy of either scorn or dubious desired, however the promotion of diversity as a tool for usurping the power of the individual is largely unworkable without the notion of sexual latency or repression. This is a proven fact of those who studied public relations and propaganda a hundred years ago. The fear of and desire for homosexuality is a necessary building block of a successful PR campaign because it is the low-hanging fruit of sexual repression. As for gays themselves, the issue of diversity fits well into the notion of looking beyond the borders of the nation-state, which they would naturally be expected by society to loath as a result of having been used and tossed out of the political mainstream. Think of the gays as the Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s of the world. By exploiting themselves sexually, they both perpetuate and profit from this corrupt system. Gays have been conditioned to be thought of as trading their rights in return for a variety, albeit diversity, of sex partners. Bad habits die hard, especially when the system is geared that way after people have been conditioned to think that way for years, and in which there are those who have perfected its use more effectively than an armada of Viagra advertisements could ever accomplish.

Alas, we have the great super structure which has been built over the years around the diversity issue, and as with other permanent victim groups, blacks have been coaxed into giving up their personal rights in return for promises from the government, which of course amounts to reparations for slavery. The guilt machine is in high gear when it comes to blacks because of vacant militant threats. The Tarzan-esque media representation of blacks as the enemy combatant within is easily woven into the fabric of both black and white sensitivities, which results in a natural polarization based upon pure mythology. Insert a cheetah, a lion, and other various and sundry exotic animals into the story and even a seemingly benign and loving production such as The Lion King and Beauty and the Beast can continue the promotion of stereotypes. And it is done so well and so surreptitiously that is immediately hailed as charming and appealing. The us-against-them mentality of African stereotypes is such an integral part of the fabric of propaganda in America to the point at which it has been ingrained into the national mentality, and it is now the quintessential structure of American thought, which pervades practically all PR campaigns. Diversity is the key word in describing these efforts, which is another way of saying that all others who aspire to actually benefit from exploitation must wait their turn behind the mother of all propaganda from whence the wellspring of all victimization is traced.

Of course, America is diverse. People have differing backgrounds, beliefs, and heritage. It is highly irresponsible to try to homogenize and categorize the notion of diversity into several small groups, however, this is the reason why diversity has become so irresponsible itself. This is the inherent critical mistake of those who profess a knowledge of and utilization for diversity, which is that all differing groups can be identified, defined, and categorized. The answer to all of this is simple. Diversity is a term that refers to propaganda techniques for gaining power in return for indulging certain groups of people, who identify with stereotypes that have been preset for them. This is why diversity is this week’s Daily Nigger, because it is just a public relations ruse just like the people themselves who identify with the term for their own personal gain.

-TDN

This entry was posted on Friday, October 23rd, 2009 at 10:40 and is filed under Free Speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.